Cornerstone laid for the Statue of Liberty

Event Date: 
Repeats every year until Sun Aug 05 2035 .
August 5, 2012
August 5, 2013
August 5, 2014
August 5, 2015
August 5, 2016
August 5, 2017
August 5, 2018
August 5, 2019
August 5, 2020
August 5, 2021
August 5, 2022
August 5, 2023
August 5, 2024
August 5, 2025
August 5, 2026
August 5, 2027
August 5, 2028
August 5, 2029
August 5, 2030
August 5, 2031
August 5, 2032
August 5, 2033
August 5, 2034
August 5, 2035
Event Date Display: 
August 5, 1884

Cornerstone of White House laid

Main Subject Areas: 
Event Date: 
Repeats every year until Sat Oct 13 2035 .
October 13, 2010
October 13, 2011
October 13, 2012
October 13, 2013
October 13, 2014
October 13, 2015
October 13, 2016
October 13, 2017
October 13, 2018
October 13, 2019
October 13, 2020
October 13, 2021
October 13, 2022
October 13, 2023
October 13, 2024
October 13, 2025
October 13, 2026
October 13, 2027
October 13, 2028
October 13, 2029
October 13, 2030
October 13, 2031
October 13, 2032
October 13, 2033
October 13, 2034
October 13, 2035
Event Date Display: 
October 13, 1792

International Women's Day

Main Subject Areas: 
Event Date: 
Repeats every year until Thu Mar 08 2035 .
March 8, 2010
March 8, 2011
March 8, 2012
March 8, 2013
March 8, 2014
March 8, 2015
March 8, 2016
March 8, 2017
March 8, 2018
March 8, 2019
March 8, 2020
March 8, 2021
March 8, 2022
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2024
March 8, 2025
March 8, 2026
March 8, 2027
March 8, 2028
March 8, 2029
March 8, 2030
March 8, 2031
March 8, 2032
March 8, 2033
March 8, 2034
March 8, 2035
Event Date Display: 
March 8, 1911

Lincoln's first inaugural address

Main Subject Areas: 
Event Date: 
Repeats every year until Sun Mar 04 2035 .
March 4, 2010
March 4, 2011
March 4, 2012
March 4, 2013
March 4, 2014
March 4, 2015
March 4, 2016
March 4, 2017
March 4, 2018
March 4, 2019
March 4, 2020
March 4, 2021
March 4, 2022
March 4, 2023
March 4, 2024
March 4, 2025
March 4, 2026
March 4, 2027
March 4, 2028
March 4, 2029
March 4, 2030
March 4, 2031
March 4, 2032
March 4, 2033
March 4, 2034
March 4, 2035
Event Date Display: 
March 4, 1861
The great presidential puzzle / J.A. Wales

Electing America’s Presidents

Every four years American citizens make one of their most serious choices as a people when they vote for president. EDSITEment has lessons about some of the most important and dramatic presidential elections in the early decades of the republic. These lessons not only give students opportunities to read significant primary sources authored by the candidates and others but also the path to a better understanding of the historical context of these races.

Histories of the National Mall

Explore historical maps, discover stories you never knew, find people and historical events related to the Mall's past.

A New Nation Votes: American Election Returns 1787-1825

A New Nation Votes is a searchable collection of election returns from the earliest years of American democracy. The data were compiled by Philip Lampi. The American Antiquarian Society and Tufts University Digital Collections and Archives have mounted it online for you with funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities.

old print of voters from A Nation Votes

A New Nation Votes: American Election Returns 1787-1825

A New Nation Votes is a searchable collection of election returns from the earliest years of American democracy. The American Antiquarian Society and Tufts University Digital Collections and Archives have mounted it online for you with funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities.

Lesson Plans: Grades 9-12
Curriculum Unit

The Diplomacy Challenge (7 Lessons)

Created October 22, 2015



The Unit


Diplomacy Challenge: Ottoman Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror

Follower of Gentile Bellini, Portrait of Mehmet II (1432–1481).

Credit: National Gallery, London. Yorck Project. Public Domain 1.0

"One must remember that the diplomat’s hope is in man’s reason and good will…. Even Machiavelli himself was not in practice Machiavellian.”

—Garrett Mattingly, Renaissance Diplomacy

During the Early Modern era (1450–1750), the expansion in maritime trade and the incorporation of the Americas into worldwide exchanges meant the world became increasingly interconnected. These connections led to a greater need for diplomatic relations with other states. Like many modern institutions, diplomacy as we know it today had its origins during this period. 

This unit asks teams of students to play the role of diplomats in the Early Modern era. Each team is charged with a particular empire, and students compare the perceived national interests of their empires to the empires of other teams. In the process, they must consider multiple perspectives and anticipate the actions and reactions of their diplomatic peers.

Students will do the authentic work of diplomats by first gathering intelligence through selected primary and secondary sources, then by building relationships with other diplomats through a reception banquet, and finally by negotiating treaties in the interest of their empires.

This unit has been conceived as a process. To gain maximum benefit, it is suggested that the lessons be taught sequentially.

Guiding Questions

  • How did Early Modern empires use diplomacy to maintain and expand their power?
  • How do diplomats use intelligence to build relationships?

College and Career Readiness Standards

    Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words.


World historians do not always agree on periodization, as a review of textbook chronologies will show. Most, however, do concur that the mid-15th century was a key turning point in World History. European exploration and settlement of the Americas and the cultural and economic exchange that resulted profoundly transformed the world. The Columbian Exchange; the role of China as a both consumer and supplier in the world economy; the development of the plantation system and chattel slavery; as well as the rise of the modern corporation all emerged during this period, which most historians call Early Modern (1450–1750).

Diplomacy is a good way to teach students about the Early Modern era. Diplomacy as we know it today, has its origins during this period. Many of the well-known Early Modern primary source texts we have are in fact documents related to diplomacy. Having students think like diplomats requires them to consider other perspectives. Primary source documents and information become “intelligence” that student need to analyze from the perspective of not only one empire but of others, as well.

The Early Modern era was the first time many empires and kingdoms in Africa and Asia had to deal directly with representatives of European empires, who were persistent in their presence and demanded recognition as equals. These “hairy barbarians”—as they were called in Japan—insisted on trade on their terms, often with the threat of force behind it.

Diplomacy, however did not only take place between European and Asian or European and African monarchs. Increased interaction between Asian states, for example, occurred as well. Letters between the Ottoman Sultan and the Safavid Shah show how the religious schisms within Islam paralleled those within Christian Europe.

Our unit also is about more than European conquest. It is important for students to understand that a great deal of Early Modern history was being made by non-European empires even after Spain and European empires settled the Americas.

We should not forget that the Early Modern period is the time of the Muslim “Gun Powder Empires” (The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughals), which dominated Central Europe to India. As historian Philip Curtain notes, the European economy was still less productive than the Indian economy, which during the time of Akbar was the wealthiest empire in the world. The Ottomans were the dominant military and political power in Central Europe and the Middle East. Although they struck fear in the hearts of Western Christian monarchs, Europe was only one of many concerns for the Ottomans, who were frequently at war with their Shi’ite Muslim neighbors the Safavids to the East.

In East Asia, the Qing Empire already had a well-established maritime trade network within East Asia. No doubt, Europeans were often intentional “disrupters” of the trade systems they joined, but in the Indian Ocean, up until the mid-18th century, Asians carried more trade in the Indian Ocean than Europeans did.

[One note on this unit: While the lessons cover a range of empires and kingdoms throughout Afro-Eurasia, they do not address two key American empires (Aztec and Inca) in existence at the time of the European conquest because, as political units, those empires ceased to exist by the early 16th century.]


As a summative assessment, student will write a compare and contrast essay of two Early Modern empires by responding to the prompt:

The Early Modern era saw the rise and expansion of global empires. Compare and contrast the economic policies and religious attitudes of one land-based empire and one sea-based empire during this time period. Address how these policies and attitudes were used by the empires to maintain and expand their power.

Extending the Unit

Have students research the crops and food that was exchanged as a result of Early Modern diplomacy and create a Columbian Exchange Cookbook.

Additional resources:

The Lessons

The Basics

Grade Level


Subject Areas
  • History and Social Studies > Themes > Common Core
  • History and Social Studies > World > The Modern World (1500 CE-Present)
  • History and Social Studies > Themes > Globalization
  • History and Social Studies > Themes > Politics and Citizenship
  • History and Social Studies > Themes > War and Foreign Policy
  • Critical analysis
  • Critical thinking
  • Interpretation
  • Making inferences and drawing conclusions
  • Map Skills
  • Using primary sources
  • Lesson Three. The Power of the Majority over Thought

    Created October 15, 2015
    Alexis de Tocqueville portrait

    In Tocqueville’s discussion of how the majority in America constrains freedom of thought, he makes some of the most extreme criticisms against democracy. For example, he says “I do not know any country where, in general, less independence of mind and genuine freedom of discussion reign than in America”; and, “there is no freedom of mind in America.”